Re: Return value of pg_promote()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Return value of pg_promote()
Date: 2023-08-28 09:09:44
Message-ID: ZOxkWJJnmjA0VCLD@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:50:45AM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing the patch and adding a CF entry for it. PFA patch
> that addresses your review comments.

That looks OK seen from here. Perhaps others have more comments?

> And... Sorry for the delayed response. I totally missed it.

No problem.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2023-08-28 09:27:27 Re: Support prepared statement invalidation when result types change
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2023-08-28 08:17:18 Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location