From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Wyatt Alt <wyatt(dot)alt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cache lookup failed dropping public schema with trgm index |
Date: | 2023-08-22 01:43:59 |
Message-ID: | ZOQS33jPKE8+bP1Z@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:27:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. I see that 911e7020 modified pg_trgm's install script with
>
> +ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY gist_trgm_ops USING gist
> +ADD FUNCTION 10 (text) gtrgm_options (internal);
>
> I wonder whether that correctly adds a dependency to ensure the
> opfamily is dropped before the function.
The dependencies look OK seen from here when it comes to the
extension, the indexes or the option function. See, for instance:
=# SELECT pg_describe_object(classid, objid, objsubid) as obj,
pg_describe_object(refclassid,refobjid,refobjsubid) as objref,
deptype FROM pg_depend
WHERE (classid = 'pg_proc'::regclass AND objid = 'gtrgm_options'::regproc)
OR (refclassid = 'pg_proc'::regclass AND refobjid = 'gtrgm_options'::regproc);
-[ RECORD 1]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
obj | function gtrgm_options(internal)
objref | schema public
deptype | n
-[ RECORD 2
]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
obj | function gtrgm_options(internal)
objref | extension pg_trgm
deptype | e
-[ RECORD 3]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
obj | function 10 (text, text) of operator family gist_trgm_ops for access method gist: gtrgm_options(internal)
objref | function gtrgm_options(internal)
deptype | a
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-08-22 05:32:06 | Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-08-21 23:27:19 | Re: cache lookup failed dropping public schema with trgm index |