Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date: 2023-08-21 23:25:11
Message-ID: ZOPyVwWfcdOQgB6a@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 04:08:46PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Doesn't seem worth it to me. I think --no-sync is more intuitive than
> --sync-method=none, it's certainly shorter, and it's a pretty
> important setting because we use it when running the regression tests.

No arguments against that ;)
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2023-08-21 23:43:56 Re: Logging of matching pg_hba.conf entry during auth skips trust auth, potential security issue
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-21 23:22:36 Re: Logging of matching pg_hba.conf entry during auth skips trust auth, potential security issue