From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions |
Date: | 2023-08-14 09:26:42 |
Message-ID: | ZNnzUiB1KBZsUt+a@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 05:55:42PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> I'm thinking a name like "contrib name + description summary" would
> be nice. The "contrib name" is namespace-like and the "description summary"
> is the same as the name of the waiting event name in core. For example,
> "DblinkConnect" for dblink. In the same as the core one, I thought the name
> should be the camel case.
Or you could use something more in line with the other in-core wait
events formatted as camel-case, like DblinkConnect, etc.
> BTW, is it better to discuss this in a new thread because other developers
> might be interested in user-facing wait event names? I also would like to
> add documentation on the wait events for each modules, as they are not mentioned
> now.
Saying that, having some documentation on the page of each extension
is mandatory once these can be customized, in my opinion. All that
should be discussed on a new, separate thread, to attract the correct
audience.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-08-14 09:32:24 | Re: proposal: jsonb_populate_array |
Previous Message | Nikita Malakhov | 2023-08-14 09:17:04 | Re: POC: Extension for adding distributed tracing - pg_tracing |