Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Date: 2023-08-12 00:27:38
Message-ID: ZNbR+quXlwscAeOL@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 08:11:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. I'm allergic to anything that significantly increases the cost
> of check-world, and this seems like it'd do that.
>
> Maybe we could automate it, but not as part of check-world per se?

It does not have to be part of check-world by default, as we could
make it optional with PG_TEST_EXTRA. I bet that most committers set
this option for most of the test suites anyway, so the extra cost is
OK from here. I don't find a single indent run to be that costly,
especially with parallelism:
$ time ./src/tools/pgindent/pgindent .
real 0m5.039s
user 0m3.403s
sys 0m1.540s
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-08-12 00:29:05 Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-08-12 00:11:34 Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner