Re: Base files compatibility between PG11 and PG15

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Base files compatibility between PG11 and PG15
Date: 2023-08-17 23:39:21
Message-ID: ZN6vqYK9I554SNYG@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:36:20AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 8/17/23 02:32, Abraham, Danny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a database on Aurora(at)RDS(dot)
> > It Used V11.9, and then upgraded automatically by AWS to V15.2 AWS states that it relies on compatibility provided by the PG community.
> > We now experience problems with the data.
>
> This needs more information:
>
> 1) Describe the upgrade process
>
> 2) Describe the data problems.

Plus it is Aurora, which is not community Postgres.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Knecht 2023-08-18 03:37:03 To create or not to create that index
Previous Message GF 2023-08-17 17:12:58 Re: AW: AW: Cast INTEGER to BIT confusion