Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.
Date: 2023-07-20 09:29:10
Message-ID: ZLj+ZiSonRRxMIvF@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:54:55PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> Yes, you're right. When I tried using worker_spi to test wait event,
> I found the behavior. And thanks a lot for your patch. I wasn't aware
> of the way. I'll merge your patch to the tests for wait events.

Be careful when using that. I have not spent more than a few minutes
to show my point, but what I sent lacks a shmem_request_hook in
_PG_init(), for example, to request an amount of shared memory equal
to the size of the state structure.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-07-20 09:39:04 Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-20 09:09:53 Re: There should be a way to use the force flag when restoring databases