Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Date: 2023-07-14 04:49:22
Message-ID: ZLDT0kOh0tuh6IpV@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:26:54AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I would like to apply 0001 and 0002 to improve the format if there are
> no objections. 0003 and 0004 are still here for discussion, as it
> does not seem like a consensus has been reached for that yet. Getting
> more opinions would be a good next step for the last two patches, I
> assume.

I have looked again at 0001 and 0002 and applied them to get them out
of the way. 0003 and 0004 are rebased and attached. I'll add them to
the CF for later consideration. More opinions are welcome.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0003-Rename-wait-events-with-more-consistent-camelcase.patch text/x-diff 18.8 KB
v3-0004-Remove-column-for-enum-elements-in-wait_event_nam.patch text/x-diff 52.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-14 05:02:28 Re: add non-option reordering to in-tree getopt_long
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-07-14 04:38:42 Re: add non-option reordering to in-tree getopt_long