Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Date: 2023-07-11 00:20:45
Message-ID: ZKygXRmGpgZpTS6H@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:00:00AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:05 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> @Andres: Were there any extra tests you wanted to be run for more
>> input?
>
> @Andres Freund please let us know your thoughts.

Err, ping. It seems like this thread is waiting on input from you,
Andres?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tristan Partin 2023-07-11 00:52:32 Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Previous Message David Rowley 2023-07-10 23:51:11 Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts