Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
Date: 2023-07-10 06:43:07
Message-ID: ZKuoe7LyX9U0PYNr@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 08:49:26PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:21:18AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Removing the GUC from this table is kind of annoying. Cannot this be
>> handled like default_with_oids or ssl_renegotiation_limit to avoid any
>> kind of issues with the reload of dump files and the kind?
>
> Ah, good catch.

Thanks. Reading through the patch, this version should be able to
handle the dump reloads.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-07-10 07:08:31 Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Previous Message Richard Guo 2023-07-10 06:39:27 Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower