Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2023-07-03 22:16:47
Message-ID: ZKNIz0fhppRzq2S0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 06:40:49AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> curculio (OpenBSD 5.9) is failing with "undefined reference to
> `X509_get_signature_nid'", but that's OK, Mikael already supplied a
> modern OpenBSD system to replace it (schnauzer, which is green) and he
> was planning to shut curculio down (see Direct I/O thread where that
> came up because its GCC 4.2 compiler doesn't understand our stack
> alignment directives; it will also break comprehensively when I push
> the nearby all-supported-computers-have-locale_t patch from the
> check_strxfrm_bug thread).

The second and third animals to fail are skate and snapper, both using
Debian 7 Wheezy. As far as I know, it was an LTS supported until
2018. The owner of both machines is added in CC. I guess that we
this stuff could just remove --with-openssl from the configure
switches.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-07-03 22:20:18 Re: Size vs size_t or, um, PgSize?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-03 22:13:03 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?