| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Deleting prepared statements from libpq. |
| Date: | 2023-06-23 07:53:30 |
| Message-ID: | ZJVPeltOzerUodLf@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 09:39:00AM +0200, Jelte Fennema wrote:
> To be clear, it didn't actually change the behaviour. I only changed
> the error message, since it said the exact opposite of what it was
> expecting. I split this minor fix into its own commit now to clarify
> that. I think it would even make sense to commit this small patch to
> the PG16 branch, since it's a bugfix in the tests (and possibly even
> back-patch to others if that's not a lot of work).
Yes, agreed that this had better be fixed and backpatched. This
avoids some backpatching fuzz, and that's incorrect as it stands.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2023-06-23 08:23:14 | Re: Do we want a hashset type? |
| Previous Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2023-06-23 07:45:05 | patch: improve "user mapping not found" error message |