Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation
Date: 2023-06-21 23:37:26
Message-ID: ZJOJtk18kNQOnllW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> LGTM. I think this can wait for v17 since the current behavior has been
> around since 2001 and AFAIK this is the first report. While it's arguably
> a bug fix, the patch also breaks some cases that work today.

Agreed that anything discussed on this thread does not warrant a
backpatch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-06-21 23:53:31 Re: Remove deprecation warnings when compiling PG ~13 with OpenSSL 3.0~
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-06-21 23:27:48 Re: Why does pg_bsd_indent need to be installed?