Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-22 13:44:40
Message-ID: ZGtxyLcBJhYEjbkH@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2023-05-22 09:42:44 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > I noticed that the value that enables this feature at libpq client side
> > is 'enable'. However, for other Boolean settings like sslsni,
> > keepalives, requiressl, sslcompression, the value that enables feature
> > is '1' -- we use strings only for "enum" type of settings.
>
> > Also, it looks like connectOptions2() doesn't validate the string value.
>
> Hmm, it certainly seems like this ought to accept exactly the
> same inputs as other libpq boolean settings. I can take a look
> unless somebody else is already on it.

I'm working on it.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-05-22 13:47:12 Re: RFI: Extending the TOAST Pointer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-22 13:42:44 Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg