Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-21 03:27:29
Message-ID: ZGmPocUZ3cl9VQm+@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 11:21:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 09:33:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> With less then 48 hours to beta 1 packaging, I have made this change and
> >> adjusted internal variable to match.
>
> > The buildfarm and cfbot seem unhappy with 9c0a0e2. It looks like there are
> > a few remaining uses of gss_accept_deleg to rename. I'm planning to commit
> > the attached patch shortly.
>
> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection
> parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats
> me to it.

Oh, I didn't consider those. I thought we would leave libpq alone since
those are often supplied on the command line and there are existing
short-style libpq options, e.g., gssencmode, krbsrvname, sslcrl.

I am fine with such a change though.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-05-21 03:41:22 Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-21 03:21:57 Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg