Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

At 2023-05-20 23:21:57 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 09:33:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> With less then 48 hours to beta 1 packaging, I have made this change and
> >> adjusted internal variable to match.
>
> > The buildfarm and cfbot seem unhappy with 9c0a0e2. It looks like there are
> > a few remaining uses of gss_accept_deleg to rename. I'm planning to commit
> > the attached patch shortly.
>
> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection
> parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats
> me to it.

I was trying the change to see if it would be better to name it
"gssdelegate" instead (as in delegate on one side, and accept the
delegation on the other), but decided that "gssdelegation=enable"
reads better than "gssdelegate=enable".

Here's the diff.

-- Abhijit