| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |
| Date: | 2023-05-19 13:16:09 |
| Message-ID: | ZGd2mdsRB930t2mq@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 09:07:26AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> > Why is the new PG 16 GUC called "gss_accept_deleg" and not
> > "gss_accept_delegation"? The abbreviation here seems atypical.
>
> At the time it felt natural to me but I don't feel strongly about it,
> happy to change it if folks would prefer it spelled out.
Yes, please do spell it out, thanks. The fact "deleg" looks similar to
"debug" also doesn't help.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2023-05-19 13:35:19 | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2023-05-19 13:07:26 | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |