Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?
Date: 2023-05-18 20:56:39
Message-ID: ZGaRB7EVdzYZ7Mm+@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:56:48PM -0500, Ron wrote:
> We need to keep costs down, too.
>
> Oracle (I think) does it at the DB level, and so does SQL Server.  Upper
> Management hears us say "sorry, no can do" and wonders what bunch of amateurs
> are developing PostgreSQL.

I have found it is hard to protect against the judgment of the ignorant,
so I usually don't bother.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2023-05-18 21:10:02 Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?
Previous Message Victor Nordam Suadicani 2023-05-18 20:50:14 Re: Is there a good way to handle sum types (or tagged unions) in PostgreSQL?