On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 05:06:03PM +0100, Anton Kirilov wrote:
> In any case I am not particularly attached to any naming or the exact shape
> of the new API, as long as it achieves the same goal (reducing the number of
> system calls), but before I make any substantial changes to my patch, I
> would like to hear your thoughts on the matter.
Another thing that may matter in terms of extensibility? Would a
boolean argument really be the best design? Could it be better to
have instead one API with a bits32 and some flags controlling its
internals?
--
Michael