Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Denis Laxalde <denis(dot)laxalde(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: Anton Kirilov <antonvkirilov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
Date: 2023-04-28 07:10:05
Message-ID: ZEtxTRkVn93TvpeD@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:06:27PM +0200, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Thank you; this V2 looks good to me.
> Marking as ready for committer.

Please note that we are in a stabilization period for v16 and that the
first commit fest of v17 should start in July, so it will perhaps take
some time before this is looked at by a committer.

Speaking of which, what was the performance impact of your application
once PQflush() was moved out of the pipeline sync? Just asking for
curiosity..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-04-28 07:16:14 Re: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-04-28 06:44:04 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode