| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Various typo fixes |
| Date: | 2023-04-14 04:13:09 |
| Message-ID: | ZDjS1QajDXkHh/cE@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:44:43PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> It could be "an inadequate wal-level" or "a prohibitively low
> wal-level", but Thom's language is better. "too low a wal-level" means
> the same thing as "too low of a wal-level" (which would also be fine).
I have been studying more this point, and you are right that this is
much better. So applied with this wording, after adding more markups
where these were needed.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-04-14 04:14:01 | segfault tied to "IS JSON predicate" commit |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-04-14 03:50:29 | Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets |