Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry
Date: 2023-03-27 22:38:25
Message-ID: ZCIa4alHwix6o0if@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 10:24:46AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I do like/prefer "block read requests" and
> "blocks requested found in cache"
> Though, now I fear my initial complaint may have been a bit pedantic.

That's fine. Let's ask for extra opinions, then.

So, have others an opinion to share here?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-27 22:41:48 Re: Generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-27 22:38:23 Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns