Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Date: 2023-04-06 02:08:30
Message-ID: ZC4pntQh0scRFuMs@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 06:54:54PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-04-06 01:33:56 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I'll go over this again tomorrow with fresh eyes, but I think it should
>> be pretty close to ready. (Need to amend docs to note the new NO
>> INHERIT option for NOT NULL table constraints, and make sure pg_dump
>> complies.)
>
> Missed this thread somehow. This is not a review - I just want to say that I
> am very excited that we might finally catalogue NOT NULL constraints. This has
> been a long time in the making...

+1!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-06 02:14:42 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-04-06 02:06:35 Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages