From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count |
Date: | 2023-03-23 23:33:49 |
Message-ID: | ZBzh3S2CfuoIwzCI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:46:56PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I'm fairly convinced it's a timeout in the interactive psql session. Given how
> ugly the use of that is I'm sort of waiting for Andres' refactoring patch [0] to
> commit this such that I can rewrite the test in a saner and more robust way.
FWIW, I'd be OK here even if you don't have a test for libpq in the
first change as what you have sent is already testing for the core
machinery in scram-common.c. You could always add one later.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-23 23:56:35 | Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2023-03-23 23:22:08 | Re: PGDOCS - function pg_get_publication_tables is not documented? |