Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label
Date: 2023-03-13 01:06:34
Message-ID: ZA53Gi2SdK8NEobq@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:59:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> My apologies for the long message, but this deserves some attention,
> IMHO.

Note: A CF entry has been added as of [1], and I have added an item in
the list of live issues on the open item page for 16.

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/4244/
[2]: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items#Live_issues
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-13 01:17:12 Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-03-13 00:15:28 Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables