Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Date: 2023-03-14 02:36:17
Message-ID: ZA/dod2GUKaOl61Z@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> Looks good to me.

Ok, thanks for looking. Let's wait a bit and see if others have an
opinion to offer. At least, the CI is green.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-03-14 02:38:45 Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-03-14 02:13:37 Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format