From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Ryo Kanbayashi <kanbayashi(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string |
Date: | 2025-03-13 00:42:17 |
Message-ID: | Z9Ip6YbTU3MEFBXP@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:49AM +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> If you can't work for ther patch for a while because you are busy or
> other some reason,
> I can become additinal reviewer and apply review comments from Micael
> to the patch instead of you.
>
> If you don't want my action, please reply and notice me that. If
> possible, within a week :)
Putting a bit of context here. Most of the Postgres hackers based in
Japan had a meeting last Friday, and Kanbayashi-san has asked me about
patches that introduce to simpler code paths in the tree that could be
worked on for this release. I've mentioned this thread to him.
> Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your
> contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost.
Authors and reviewers get busy because of life and work matters, and
contributions are listed in the commit logs for everybody who
participates. If you can help move this patch forward, thanks a lot
for the help! IMO, that would be great. The patch set still needs
more reorganization and adjustments, but I think that we can get it
there.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-03-13 01:05:02 | Re: pg_rewind with --write-recovery-conf option doesn't write dbname to primary_conninfo value. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-13 00:41:29 | Dubious server log messages after pg_upgrade |