Re: Vacuum timing in pg_stat_all_tables

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Vacuum timing in pg_stat_all_tables
Date: 2025-03-12 10:52:57
Message-ID: Z9FniRKBthyaC9tn@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:24:26PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Like "more stats are always nice" I think that "more explanations in the doc" are
> always nice, so I don't see any reason why not to add this extra explanation.

Attached an attempt to do so.

Note that it does not add extra explanation to "cost-based delay". If we feel the
need we could add a link to "<xref linkend="runtime-config-resource-vacuum-cost"/>"
like it has been done for delay_time in bb8dff9995f.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Add-more-details-for-pg_stat_all_tables.patch text/x-diff 2.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-03-12 10:59:37 Re: Statistics import and export: difference in statistics of materialized view dumped
Previous Message Rahila Syed 2025-03-12 10:46:10 Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations