From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Date: | 2025-03-08 21:57:25 |
Message-ID: | Z8y9RTT-vU6oVI_Y@nathan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 03:01:41AM +0530, Ayush Vatsa wrote:
> Maybe we can move ahead with the patch if we can see no other concerns.
I think we should allow some time in case others want to review the patch.
I do see a concern upthread about increased deadlock risk [0], but your
patch doesn't lock the table, but unless I'm wrong [1] (which is always
possible), it doesn't need to lock it.
Anyway, here is a tidied up patch.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/1246906.1739896202%40sss.pgh.pa.us
[1] https://postgr.es/m/Z8yxsm9ZWVkHlPbV%40nathan
--
nathan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-pg_prewarm-For-indexes-check-privileges-on-table.patch | text/plain | 3.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-08 22:17:40 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Previous Message | Ayush Vatsa | 2025-03-08 21:31:41 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Todd M. Kover | 2025-03-08 21:58:55 | Re: pg16 && GSSAPI && Heimdal/Macos |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-08 21:39:15 | Printing window function OVER clauses in EXPLAIN |