Re: per backend WAL statistics

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per backend WAL statistics
Date: 2025-03-07 08:33:04
Message-ID: Z8qvQFG/70pt33E0@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 02:42:13PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:33:52AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Indeed, there is no reason for pgstat_backend_have_pending_cb() to return true if
> > pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype() is not satisfied.
> >
> > So it deserves a dedicated patch to fix this already existing issue:
> > 0001 attached.
>
> pgstat_backend_have_pending_cb(void)
> {
> - return (!pg_memory_is_all_zeros(&PendingBackendStats,
> - sizeof(struct PgStat_BackendPending)));
> + if (!pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(MyBackendType))
> + return false;
> + else
> + return (!pg_memory_is_all_zeros(&PendingBackendStats,
> + sizeof(struct PgStat_BackendPending)));
>
> So, if I understand your point correctly, it is not a problem on HEAD
> because we are never going to update PendingBackendStats in the
> checkpointer as pgstat_count_backend_io_op[_time]() blocks any attempt
> to do so.

I think this is wrong on HEAD because we initialize PendingBackendStats to
zeros in pgstat_create_backend() based on the backend type (pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype()).

But when it's time to flush, then pgstat_backend_have_pending_cb() checks
for zeros in PendingBackendStats *without* any check on the backend type.

I think the issue is "masked" on HEAD because PendingBackendStats is
probably automatically initialized with zeros (as being a static variable at
file scope).

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-03-07 09:01:18 Revert workarounds for -Wmissing-braces false positives on old GCC
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-03-07 08:12:20 Re: Selectively invalidate caches in pgoutput module