Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently
Date: 2025-02-28 22:08:01
Message-ID: Z8IzwUrBiSr_Vv1V@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:42:17PM +0300, Ilia Evdokimov wrote:
> I´ve addressed all your comments on the v9 patch for updating the
> descriptions of auto_explain.log_min_duration and
> auto_explain.log_parameter_max_length. Just wanted to check if you had a
> chance to take another look. Let me know if there´s anything else that needs
> to be adjusted.

Committed, sorry for the delay.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-02-28 22:09:54 Re: Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-02-28 22:00:18 Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations