| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2025-02-28 22:11:46 |
| Message-ID: | Z8I0oivM6i8NS3IB@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 04:52:02PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 4:25 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 14:56 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> I'm curious what the use-case is for pg_upgrade's --no-statistics
>>> option.
>>
>> Mostly completeness and paranoia. I don't see a real use case. If we
>> decide we don't need it, that's fine with me.
>
> Completeness/symmetry and paranoia was how I viewed it. I suppose it might
> be useful in a failsafe if a pg_upgrade failed and you needed a way to
> retry.
Got it. I have no strong opinion on the matter.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-02-28 22:09:54 | Re: Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement? |