From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock |
Date: | 2025-02-28 13:43:58 |
Message-ID: | Z8G9nuxmMdFgZJrI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Feb-28, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Saying that, I have also done similar tests with your v12 for a couple
>> of hours and this looks stable under installcheck-world. I can see
>> that you've reworked quite a bit the surroundings of InitializedFrom
>> in this one. If you apply that once again at some point, the
>> buildfarm will be judge in the long-term, but I am rather confident by
>> saying that the situation looks better here, at least.
>
> Heh, no amount of testing can prove lack of bugs; but for sure "it looks
> different now, so it must be correct" must be the weakest proof of
> correctness I've heard of!
Err, okay. I did use the word "stable" with tests rather than
"correct", and I implied upthread that I did not check the correctness
nor the internals of the patch. If my words held the meaning you
are implying, well, my apologies for the confusion, I guess. I only
tested the patch and it was stable while I've noticed a few diffs with
the previous version, but I did *not* check its internals at all, nor
do I mean that I endorse its logic. I hope that's clear now.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yura Sokolov | 2025-02-28 13:55:21 | Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2025-02-28 13:43:52 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |