Re: per backend WAL statistics

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: per backend WAL statistics
Date: 2025-02-27 07:47:09
Message-ID: Z8AYfdtGFYpLgn4b@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:02:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 0001 was OK, so done.

Thanks!

> In 0002, couldn't it be better to have the pg_stat_get_backend_stats()
> static in pgstatfuncs.c? In 0003, pg_stat_get_backend_wal() is also
> in pgstatfuncs.c, meaning that all the callers of
> pg_stat_get_backend_stats() would be in this file.

That's how I did it initially but decided to move it to pgstat_backend.c. The
reason was that it's fully linked to "per backend" stats and that there is
no SQL api on top of it (while I think that's the case for almost all the ones
in pgstatfuncs.c). Thoughts?

> -typedef struct PgStat_Backend
> -{
> - TimestampTz stat_reset_timestamp;
> - PgStat_BktypeIO io_stats;
> -} PgStat_Backend;
> -
> /* ---------
> * PgStat_BackendPending Non-flushed backend stats.
> * ---------
>
> In 0003, let's keep PgStat_BackendPending grouped with PgStat_Backend,
> so it sounds better to move both of them after the WAL stats
> structures.

Makes sense. I did not had in mind to submit a new patch version (to at least
implement the above) without getting your final thoughts on your first comment.
But since a rebase is needed anyway,then please find attached a new version. It
just implements your last comment.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v11-0001-Add-the-pg_stat_get_backend_stats-helper-for-pg_.patch text/x-diff 4.6 KB
v11-0002-per-backend-WAL-statistics.patch text/x-diff 12.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-02-27 07:58:40 RE: ReplicationSlotRelease() crashes when the instance is in the single user mode
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2025-02-27 07:39:58 Re: Add a warning message when using unencrypted passwords