From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements |
Date: | 2025-02-18 21:15:11 |
Message-ID: | Z7T4X2C6OAxrEf9Y@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 05:27:18PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Jan-31, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>
> > 3. Showing total additions/deletions of the most recent patchset on
> > patch and commitfest pages
> > 4. Showing additions/deletions of the first patch of the most recent
> > patchset on the patch page
> > 5. Showing the version and number of patches of the most recent
> > patchset on the patch page
>
> I think this has potential for excessive clutter. I propose that, if
> we're going to have a column with addition/deletions, we have two
> things:
>
> 1. the total number of addition and deletions in the whole patch
> series, for the last patchset version posted. This would be shown in
> the column.
> 2. a per-patch breakdown of the number of addition and deletions for the
> last patchset version posted, one line per patch. This would appear
> in a tooltip on the column for the totals, to avoid interface
> clutter.
>
> > 10. Allow sorting patches by total additions/deletions (added together
> > for total lines changed)
>
> Seems reasonable, though I don't see much of an use-case for this.
Looking at the live version, I can sort the "Stats" column from smallest
to largest, but not from largest to smallest. Is this intended?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-02-18 21:23:20 | Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation |
Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2025-02-18 20:55:01 | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |