Re: per backend WAL statistics

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: per backend WAL statistics
Date: 2025-02-17 07:25:46
Message-ID: Z7LkesxmaUg4lSVb@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 06:59:40AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> There is still something that would simplify what is done here: it's the
> "the elimination of the write & sync columns for pg_stat_wal" mentioned in [2].

Yeah, still you cannot just remove them because the data tracked in
pg_stat_io is not entirely the same, right?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-02-17 07:59:26 Re: per backend WAL statistics
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-02-17 07:23:56 Re: Proposal to CREATE FOREIGN TABLE LIKE