Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:50:29PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:08:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I spent a little time earlier today seeing what I could do with the
>> use-dmalloc patch I posted earlier. It turns out you can get through
>> initdb after s/free/PQfreemem/ in just two places, and then the
>> backend works fine. But psql is a frickin' disaster --- there's
>> free's of strings made with PQExpBuffer all over its backslash-command
>> handling, and no easy way to clean it up. Maybe other clients will
>> be less of a mess, but I'm not betting on that.
>
> Hmm. Okay. It sounds like it would be better to group everything
> that has been pointed together towards what should be a more generic
> solution than what I have posted. So I am holding on touching
> anything.

Two weeks later. Would there be any objections for doing something in
the lines of [1] for pg_upgrade and pg_amcheck? The pg_upgrade bit is
a bit strange, for sure, still it's better than the current state of
things.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z601RQxTmIUohdkV@paquier.xyz
--
Michael