| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay |
| Date: | 2025-02-11 22:42:26 |
| Message-ID: | Z6vSUpF0S9DHUxZf@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:51:15AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:52:46PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Off-list, I've asked Bertrand to gauge the feasibility of adding this
>> information to the autovacuum logs and to VACUUM/ANALYZE (VERBOSE). IMHO
>> those are natural places to surface this information, and I want to ensure
>> that we're not painting ourselves into a corner with the approach we're
>> using for the progress views.
>
> Yeah, I looked at it and that looks as simmple as 0003 attached (as that's the
> leader that is doing the report in case of parallel workers being used).
>
> 0001 and 0002 remain unchanged.
Thanks. I've committed 0001 and 0002.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-02-11 22:48:38 | Re: Bump soft open file limit (RLIMIT_NOFILE) to hard limit on startup |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-02-11 22:41:51 | Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently |