Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date: 2025-02-06 22:11:25
Message-ID: Z6UzjYgpXnm0lkRe@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:43:56AM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Great, I've looked at doing something like this in the libpq_pipeline
> test for better diff reporting -- what I have uses Test::Differences,
> which is pretty neat and usable, but it's not part of the standard
> installed perl modules, which is a large downside. I can probably get
> rid of my hack once you get 0001 in.

Okay, thanks for the feedback. We have been relying on diff -u for
the parts of the tests touched by 0001 for some time now, so if there
are no objections I would like to apply 0001 in a couple of days.

The CF entry has been switched as waiting on author.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2025-02-06 22:03:48 Tests for extended MCV stats compatibility with multi-filter conditions on a single column