| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |
| Date: | 2025-02-06 08:39:25 |
| Message-ID: | Z6R1PQgK-9kS4pFy@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:32:01AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> That sounds ok, but I wonder if that's the best appropriate place. I could
> think of the checkpointer test in 029_stats_restart.pl and the startup/standby
> one in one related to standby (030_stats_cleanup_replica.pl?). Though that's
> probably just a matter of taste.
Hmm. Your suggestion of 029_stats_restart.pl is a tempting choice,
indeed, more in line with the fact that we are checking some stats
data. I did not think about that.
Note that I'm OK about using 029 or even 030, as long as both queries
stay together.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chiranmoy.Bhattacharya@fujitsu.com | 2025-02-06 08:44:35 | Re: [PATCH] SVE popcount support |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-02-06 08:35:02 | Re: [PATCH] pg_stat_activity: make slow/hanging authentication more visible |