| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, yasuo(dot)honda(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com, geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com, marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(dot)trukhanov(at)gmail(dot)com, Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions |
| Date: | 2025-02-14 09:57:01 |
| Message-ID: | Z68Tba4x2N2FaER_@jrouhaud |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Feb-14, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> > Since the merging is a yes/no option (I think there used to be some discussions
> > about having a threshold or some other fancy modes), maybe you could instead
> > differentiate the merged version by have 2 constants rather than this "..." or
> > something like that?
>
> Maybe the representation can be "($1 /*, ... */)" so that it's obvious
> that the array extends beyond the first element but is still
> syntactically valid.
Yeah that works too and it's probably way easier to implement.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-02-14 10:06:04 | Re: Add an option to skip loading missing publication to avoid logical replication failure |
| Previous Message | Pavel Borisov | 2025-02-14 09:45:44 | Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock |