From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |
Date: | 2025-01-29 14:37:45 |
Message-ID: | Z5o9OQ0nwWD9tKTR@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:49:20PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Sorry for replying late.
No problem at all!
> It turns out that the difference is expected.
> It is because pg_stat_wal.wal_bytes tracks the total amount of WAL
> generated, while pg_stat_io tracks the I/Os that are written to disk.
Yeah, I do agree it's expected: Indeed pg_stat_wal.wal_bytes somehow "focus"
on the wal records size while the pg_stat_io's unit is the wal_block_size. That
makes sense and "only" affects the "bytes" (the remaining common fields looks
consistent across the 2 views).
> It is explicitly said that pg_stat_io tracks I/O operations and
> pg_stat_wal.wal_bytes tracks total amount of WAL generated in bytes. I
> think this is clear enough. Do you think we still need additional
> explanation?
I think that would not hurt to add a comment mentioning that the "bytes" are
expected to differ given the fact that the IO unit is the wal_block_size. But,
that said, I don't have a strong opinion on it, just a nice to have IMHO.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manika Singhal | 2025-01-29 15:04:28 | Re: EDB Installer initcluster script changes - review requested |
Previous Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2025-01-29 14:35:52 | Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans |