From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |
Date: | 2025-01-27 07:45:25 |
Message-ID: | Z5c5lardcmSos6pm@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:29:46PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 17:20, Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I did not look at the code yet but did a few tests.
> > I can see diff between pg_stat_wal and pg_stat_io, for example:
> >
> > "
> > postgres=# select pg_stat_reset_shared();
> > pg_stat_reset_shared
> > ----------------------
> >
> > (1 row)
> >
> > postgres=# insert into bdt select a from generate_series(1,200000) a ;
> > INSERT 0 200000
> >
> > postgres=# select wal_bytes,stats_reset from pg_stat_wal;
> > wal_bytes | stats_reset
> > -----------+-------------------------------
> > 11800088 | 2025-01-24 14:17:28.507994+00
> > (1 row)
> >
> > postgres=# select sum(write_bytes),stats_reset from pg_stat_io where object = 'wal' group by stats_reset;
> > sum | stats_reset
> > ----------+-------------------------------
> > 12853248 | 2025-01-24 14:17:28.507988+00
> > (1 row)
> >
> > Is that expected?
>
> I am not sure, I think they need to be the same.
Yeah I think so (or at least we should document the reason(s) why (and how)
they could differ).
> I could not
> understand the cause of the difference at first glance. I will look
> into this and will come back to you.
Thanks.
>
> Quick note: WAL stats in pg_stat_io view includes WAL initialization
> stats under object = 'wal' and context = 'init', your query may count
> these initialization stats too. So the correct query is:
>
> 'select sum(write_bytes),stats_reset from pg_stat_io where object =
> 'wal' and context = 'normal' group by stats_reset;'.
>
Thanks for mentioning this filtering!
> By saying that, this does not solve the problem; there is still a
> difference although you omit WAL initialization stats from the
> pg_stat_io.
Yeah. The "init" data was also empty on my side after the pg_stat_reset_shared()
and after the insertion in the table.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2025-01-27 08:05:50 | Adjust tuples estimate for appendrels |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-01-27 07:26:37 | Re: Reorder shutdown sequence, to flush pgstats later |