Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 02:03:33PM +0100, Michail Nikolaev wrote:
> I was able to stabilize (I hope so) tests on [0] without any changes to
> isolationtester and without "notices N".
>
> So, I agree, it is better to put it on a shelf now. But a few words in
> documentation may be a good idea.

Could you summarize here what you have done to achieve test
stabilization in your new patch set posted at [1] without using the
proposal of this thread?

Perhaps that's OK to leave things as they are, but your proposal here
is leading to a more natural definition in terms of how test ordering
can be enforced with injection points, leading to a less confusing
definition. The analysis of existing tests if this proposal moves
forward would be required, of course.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANtu0ohStYQkJL+_=40Odcqu2A4QPrM_VmofwkkudHGHFgymkA@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael