| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Date: | 2025-01-17 14:16:08 |
| Message-ID: | Z4pmKI2yodbDn5vw@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 02:48:29PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> pá 17. 1. 2025 v 14:41 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> napsal:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 08:18:20AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > fix oid collision
>
> What is the purpose of continually posting this patch to the email
> lists?
>
>
> The people still do a review, so I am fixing this patch. I am fixing it
> immediately, when I detect an issue.
>
> I can reduce the frequency once per week.
Is this really something we are considering applying, since it has been
around for years? I am unclear on that and we had better know if we are
going to continue reviewing this.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2025-01-17 14:20:12 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Previous Message | Zhou, Zhiguo | 2025-01-17 14:00:35 | Re: [RFC] Lock-free XLog Reservation from WAL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-01-17 15:32:07 | Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-01-17 13:48:29 | Re: Re: proposal: schema variables |