| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vinícius Abrahão <vinnix(dot)bsd(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ? |
| Date: | 2025-01-09 18:20:06 |
| Message-ID: | Z4ATVuRTHVS8kgvR@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:32:58PM +0000, Vinícius Abrahão wrote:
> Please also provide the tests on the new parameter you want to introduce.
I skimmed around and didn't see any existing tests for these kinds of
parameters, which of course isn't a great reason not to add tests, but it's
also not clear what such tests might look like. Do you have any ideas?
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-01-09 18:24:40 | Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-01-09 18:15:59 | Re: use a non-locking initial test in TAS_SPIN on AArch64 |