Re: per backend I/O statistics

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
Date: 2025-01-21 02:56:12
Message-ID: Z48MzBCRSlK4SmFK@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 01:26:55PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Right, that's another way to find it confusing ;-). But if we keep focus
> on where the pending stats are stored, it is not.

The name of the callbacks can be tuned infinitely. I have split the
renaming into its own patch, then the result looked fine after a
second look so I have applied both things separately to unlock all the
WAL patches.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2025-01-21 03:21:58 Re: Statistics Import and Export
Previous Message Peter Smith 2025-01-21 02:55:39 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation