From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: per backend WAL statistics |
Date: | 2025-01-09 04:03:15 |
Message-ID: | Z39Kg0VB7508HpZa@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:11:59AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Yeah, that's more elegant as it also means that the main callback will not change
> (should we add even more stats in the future). Done that way in v2 attached.
I've put my hands on v2-0002 to begin with something.
+/* flag bits for different types of statistics to flush */
+#define PGSTAT_FLUSH_IO (1 << 0) /* Flush I/O statistics */
+#define PGSTAT_FLUSH_ALL (PGSTAT_FLUSH_IO)
These are located and used only in pgstat_backend.c. It seems to me
that we'd better declare them in pgstat_internal.h and extend the
existing pgstat_flush_backend() with an argument so as callers can do
what they want.
+ /* Get our own entry_ref if not provided */
+ if (!entry_ref)
+ entry_ref = pgstat_get_entry_ref(PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND, InvalidOid,
+ MyProcNumber, false, NULL);
This relates to the previous remark, actually, where I think that it
is cleaner to have pgstat_flush_backend() do pgstat_get_entry_ref(),
same way as HEAD, and just pass down the flags. pgstat_flush_backend
cannot call directly pgstat_backend_flush_cb(), of course, so I've
settled down to a new pgstat_flush_backend_entry() that handles the
entry locking. This comes at the cost of pgstat_flush_backend_entry()
requiring an extra pgstat_tracks_backend_bktype(), which is not a big
issue, and the patch gets a bit shorter.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0002-PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND-code-refactoring.patch | text/x-diff | 9.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-01-09 04:53:48 | Re: WAL-logging facility for pgstats kinds |
Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2025-01-09 03:50:58 | RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |