From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PoC: history of recent vacuum/checkpoint runs (using new hooks) |
Date: | 2025-01-08 06:55:24 |
Message-ID: | Z34hXHTUWLuKuFj8@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 10:19:36PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 1/7/25 21:42, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 10:44 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> > <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Another idea regarding the storage of those metrics: I think that one would
> >> want to see "precise" data for recent metrics but would probably be fine with some
> >> level of aggregation for historical ones. Something like being able to retrieve
> >> "1 day of raw data" and say one year of data aggregated by day (average, maximum,
> >> minimum , standard deviation and maybe some percentiles) could be fine too.
> >>
> >
> > While I'm sure some people are ok with it, I would say that most of
> > the observability/metrics community has moved away from aggregated
> > data storage towards raw time series data in tools like prometheus,
> > tsdb, and timescale in order to avoid the problems that misleading /
> > lossy / low-resolution data can create.
> >
>
> That's how I see it too. My primary goal is to provide the raw data,
> even if it covers only a limited amount of time, so that it can be
> either queried directly, or ingested regularly into something like
> prometheus.
>
Okay makes sense. I was thinking about "old habits" that I had but agree that
providing raw data is more the way to go nowadays.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-01-08 06:59:40 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-01-08 06:21:26 | Re: per backend WAL statistics |