Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section
Date: 2025-01-07 17:32:58
Message-ID: Z31lSsdtgXj0mHii@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> This is my first docs patch that introduces new sections and such, so
> I'm not sure I got the indentation 100% correct (I, of course, tried
> to follow conventions).

I haven't reviewed the patch in depth, but I think it's worth considering
whether this change will break any links that work in one version but break
if you change the version number. I believe appendix-obsolete.sgml is
designed to help with that a bit, but I've had mixed results when I've
tried to use it. Of course, it's also possible that we don't care too
much...

But overall, consolidating the docs for the vacuum GUCs seems like a good
idea.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2025-01-07 17:46:44 Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2025-01-07 17:31:01 Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section